Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Frank Sterle Jr.'s avatar

There are a number of important, if not crucial, topics and information that should be taught, particularly in high school.

When I asked a Canadian teachers’ union official whether there was any mandatory child-development science curriculum taught in high-schools, he immediately replied there was not. And when I asked the reason for its absence and whether it may be due to the subject matter being too controversial, he replied with a simple “Yes”.

This strongly suggests there are philosophical thus political obstacles to teaching students even such crucial life skills as healthy parenting through understanding child development. What bewilders me, though, is how teaching such curriculum would be considered more controversial thus a non-starter than teaching sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) curriculum, as is already taught here?

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?